From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: dropping a partition may cause deadlock |
Date: | 2017-04-11 13:18:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZoKUZr8uRSGrMiPuL1=tVFKSb7vTYWW4w3pscT8M9=Ag@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
I have committed the patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-11 13:19:45 | Re: Reversed sync check in pg_receivewal |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2017-04-11 13:18:06 | Re: Some thoughts about SCRAM implementation |