Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Should vacuum process config file reload more often
Date: 2023-04-05 19:42:33
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZnCfeToWm2GKOxwMoGCWvqeO4iDLUdASoXiFAjaWLmsw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 3:04 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > Daniel: Are you intending to commit this?
>
> Yes, my plan is to get it in before feature freeze.

All right, let's make it happen! I think this is pretty close to ready
to ship, and it would solve a problem that is real, annoying, and
serious.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-04-05 19:42:57 Re: zstd compression for pg_dump
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-04-05 19:41:01 Re: monitoring usage count distribution