Re: Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Maksim Milyutin <m(dot)milyutin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2017-08-10 20:01:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZn--d1SpUp1DEQbA=E+PhVM_XLaBO6oM_LHvY_QxpKjg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:25 AM, Maksim Milyutin
<m(dot)milyutin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the feedback. Then I'll use a new relkind for local
> partitioned index in further development.

Any update on this?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2017-08-10 20:02:03 Re: emergency outage requiring database restart
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-10 18:20:19 Re: Request more documentation for incompatibility of parallelism and plpgsql exec_run_select