| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |
| Date: | 2022-02-16 20:11:56 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZm0CaokNO0huzRE7t_GaqA4=YRcRHEpxW=rOyqtHozBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 2:18 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> It seems as if the advice about single user mode persisted for no
> great reason at all. Technically there were some remaining reasons to
> keep it around (like the truncation thing), but overall these
> secondary reasons could have been addressed much sooner if somebody
> had thought about it.
I raised it on the list a couple of years ago, actually. I think I had
a bit of difficulty convincing people that it wasn't something we had
to keep recommending.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2022-02-16 20:14:16 | Re: Lowering the ever-growing heap->pd_lower |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-02-16 20:11:16 | Re: do only critical work during single-user vacuum? |