Re: Lowering temp_buffers minimum

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Lowering temp_buffers minimum
Date: 2025-02-26 21:07:48
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZjOn8WOtvptrBfoPufKs1mKmyWcNbC9EOVz1XXwK7n7w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 9:33 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Does anybody see a reason we shouldn't lower temp_buffers to match
> shared_buffers?

I do not see any such reason. I'd say go for it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Hunter 2025-02-26 21:27:17 Re: Proposal: "query_work_mem" GUC, to distribute working memory to the query's individual operators
Previous Message Alex Friedman 2025-02-26 21:01:48 Re: Doc: clarify possibility of ephemeral discrepancies between state and wait_event in pg_stat_activity