Re: AtEOXact_ApplyLauncher() and subtransactions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AtEOXact_ApplyLauncher() and subtransactions
Date: 2018-07-16 21:59:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZj3aUs5=WuC6xbyYAoRKKbvGjxn4+wTuHo9Y-31A917A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:36 AM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0001 patch contains the main fix. In this patch I have used some
> naming conventions and some comments that you used in your patch,
> plus, I used your method of lazily allocating new stack level. The
> stack is initially Null.

Committed and back-patched to v11 and v10.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Jelinek 2018-07-16 22:04:20 Re: patch to allow disable of WAL recycling
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-07-16 21:06:44 Re: New GUC to sample log queries