| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DOMAINs and CASTs |
| Date: | 2011-11-30 03:12:13 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZit3YUmOe-qosJ22tYX9cEZ1kMDi7hyyn_4ipaqoi+KQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> Well, if we apply this, it has the possibility to break existing
>>>>> dumps.
>>
>> BTW, it occurs to me that we could dodge that objection, with much less
>> work than Robert suggests, if we just made the message be a WARNING not
>> an ERROR. I think that'd do just as well in terms of what the message
>> could usefully accomplish, ie, steer people away from doing things that
>> won't work. Still not sure that it's worth doing though,
>>
>
> i'm fine with a WARNING
Me too; I suggested it before (so did you).
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-11-30 03:35:34 | Re: Patch - Debug builds without optimization |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-30 03:09:07 | Re: Reserved words and delimited identifiers |