Re: [PATCH] Doc fix for VACUUM FREEZE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Maciek Sakrejda <m(dot)sakrejda(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc fix for VACUUM FREEZE
Date: 2014-01-14 19:50:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZiPyGGWdUiXohxx6_T9YeuysU_sP0YHOCE7q_=Tyf8LQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> On 12/17/13, 8:16 PM, Maciek Sakrejda wrote:
>>> (now with patch--sorry about that)
>>
>> This patch doesn't apply.
>
> There are some recent changes around same place which broke this
> patch. Please find the modified patch attached with this mail, I had
> changed order of specifying vacuum_freeze_min_age and
> vacuum_freeze_table_age in Vacuum FREEZE option.
>
> I will mark this patch as Ready For Committer, unless there is
> any other objection for this patch.

Committed with a grammatical correction.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Bottomley 2014-01-14 20:00:29 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-01-14 19:45:33 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation