From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Remaining 9.5 open items |
Date: | 2015-12-02 13:27:51 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZhmU0uFJBVSEHK_97YrbbX5ib=kzZz1J2d2qHmCA=tYg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>> Well, it's December nearly, and we don't seem to be making much progress
>> towards pushing out 9.5.0. I see the following items on
>> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items
>>
>> * Open Row-Level Security Issues
>>
>> Seems like what's left here is only documentation fixes, but they still
>> need to get done.
>
> These are mainly just documentation improvements which I'm working on,
> though the docs were recently updated and I need to incorporate Peter's
> changes which I wasn't exactly anticipating.
So, when do you foresee this documentation stuff getting taken care
of? We kinda need to do a release here. Is this really a blocker?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-12-02 13:36:06 | Re: Gather node in OPTIMIZER_DEBUG output |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2015-12-02 13:07:29 | Re: El Capitan Removes OpenSSL Headers |