Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Kincaid <tomjohnkincaid(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: preserving db/ts/relfilenode OIDs across pg_upgrade (was Re: storing an explicit nonce)
Date: 2021-10-06 20:35:22
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZhgeXfrT5zOUkVisPQ-cuYRg2M9MBG7WrE0sgcUKQVWg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 12:44 PM Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the inputs, Robert. In the v4 patch, an unused OID (i.e, 4)
> is fixed for the template0 and the same is removed from unused oid
> list.
>
> In addition to the review comment fixes, I have removed some code that
> is no longer needed/doesn't make sense since we preserve the OIDs.

This is not a full review, but I'm wondering about this bit of code:

- if (!RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(relkind) || OidIsValid(relfilenode))
+ if (!RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(relkind) || (OidIsValid(relfilenode)
&& !create_storage))
create_storage = false;
else
{
create_storage = true;
- relfilenode = relid;
+
+ /*
+ * Create the storage with oid same as relid if relfilenode is
+ * unspecified by the caller
+ */
+ if (!OidIsValid(relfilenode))
+ relfilenode = relid;
}

This seems hard to understand, and I wonder if perhaps it can be
simplified. If !RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(relkind), then we're going to set
create_storage to false if it was previously true, and otherwise just
do nothing. Otherwise, if !create_storage, we'll enter the
create_storage = false branch which effectively does nothing.
Otherwise, if !OidIsValid(relfilenode), we'll set relfilenode = relid.
So couldn't we express that like this?

if (!RELKIND_HAS_STORAGE(relkind))
create_storage = false;
else if (create_storage && !OidIsValid(relfilenode))
relfilenode = relid;

If so, that seems more clear.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2021-10-06 20:42:35 Re: Role Self-Administration
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2021-10-06 20:33:18 Re: parallelizing the archiver