From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: replacing role-level NOINHERIT with a grant-level option |
Date: | 2022-08-31 12:07:00 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZh0wjNRg5U44BF-WLk=oO-04RzFjUtN00+rRoO47rg+Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 5:20 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 03:24:56PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > - william => charles => elizabeth => uk is OK because the first two
> > hops have ADMIN and the last hop has INHERIT
>
> Don't you mean the first two hops have INHERIT and the last has ADMIN?
I do.
> > - william => charles => elizabeth => uk => parliament is probably not
> > OK because although the first two hops have ADMIN and the last has
> > INHERIT, the third hop probably lacks INHERIT
>
> Same here. I don't mean to be pedantic, I just want to make sure I'm
> thinking of this correctly.
Right. The first two hops have INHERIT and the last has ADMIN, but the
third hop probably lacks INHERIT.
> Yes, this is very helpful. I always appreciate your detailed examples. I
> think what you are describing matches the mental model I was beginning to
> form.
Cool.
> Okay, now to take a closer look at the patch...
Thanks.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2022-08-31 12:09:06 | pg_upgrade generated files in subdir follow-up |
Previous Message | Christoph Berg | 2022-08-31 11:55:19 | Re: plpgsql-trigger.html: Format TG_ variables as table (patch) |