From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marina Polyakova <m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: WIP Patch: Precalculate stable functions, infrastructure v1 |
Date: | 2017-07-20 17:38:22 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZgD1-4-b5Ve577fXsgQY0KHXqS13DdW3ooyhH-Sr+UMw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Marina Polyakova
<m(dot)polyakova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Here I have made the 5th version of the patches. I have added the
> precalculation of all primitive nodes that don't return set, are not
> volatile themselves and their arguments are constant or precalculated
> expressions too. There're regression tests for all of them and little notes
> in the documentation. Like for the previous patches it seems that there is
> no obvious performance degradation too on regular queries (according to
> pgbench).
pgbench probably isn't a very good test for this sort of thing - it
only issues very short-running queries where the cost of evaluating
expressions is a relatively small part of the total cost. Even if
things get worse, I'm not sure if you'd see it. I'm not sure exactly
how you could construct a test case that could be harmed by this patch
- I guess you'd want to initialize lots of CacheExprs but never make
use of the caching usefully?
It could also be useful to test things like TPC-H to see if you get an
improvement.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-07-20 17:39:22 | Re: GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 7) |
Previous Message | Alik Khilazhev | 2017-07-20 17:33:25 | Re: [WIP] Zipfian distribution in pgbench |