| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately |
| Date: | 2013-06-01 03:46:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZff5KKLRR2oFwMZjbcoG0AQPHVtYu0-gi72jfEvWdAtA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>> OK, simple enough. New patch attached. I still need to do some
>> testing to verify this does not break anything, but other than
>> that, any complaints (including the notion of backpatching this
>> back to 9.1)?
>
> Here's a cleaned up version, which also includes documentation. I'll
> commit back to 9.1 in a day or two unless there are any objections.
Changing SQL syntax in the back-branches isn't normally something we
do, but I confess I don't see any real reason not to do it in this
case.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2013-06-01 06:08:14 | Re: [PATCH] add --progress option to pgbench (submission 3) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-06-01 03:42:51 | Re: extensible external toast tuple support |