| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Nishant Sharma <nishant(dot)sharma(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PROPOSAL] : Disallow use of empty column name in (column_name '') in ALTER or CREATE of foreign table. |
| Date: | 2025-03-26 18:15:19 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZeLzoQZZF7aQnOxSpyTTHZKeGFeSEZ=EOkA+igXceUVA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:12 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > I was down on it to start with, on the grounds that it wasn't adding
> > enough ease-of-use to justify even a relatively small amount of added
> > code. I'm not sure that the dump-reload failure angle is much of a
> > concern in reality, but I would have voted not to commit before and
> > I still do.
>
> OK, fair. Anyone want to argue the other side?
Apparently not, hence I am marking this Rejected.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-26 18:16:20 | Re: vacuum_truncate configuration parameter and isset_offset |
| Previous Message | Kruti Popat | 2025-03-26 18:14:50 | GSoC 2025 - Looking for Beginner-Friendly PostgreSQL Project |