| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
| Date: | 2022-08-04 14:09:05 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZe0tOoSNnWgjtD8w2hcmxoEPrFQqi9kimZmZPyfifwFA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 AM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Attached is the "band-aid / sloppy" version of the patch. Given from the
> test examples I kept seeing deltas over 100 for relfrozenxid, I chose
> 1000. The mxid delta was less, but I kept it at 1000 for consistency
> (and because I hope this test is short lived in this state), but can be
> talked into otherwise.
ISTM that you'd need to loop over the rows and do this for each row.
Otherwise I think you're just comparing results for the first relation
and ignoring all the rest.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-08-04 14:16:17 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-08-04 14:08:02 | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |