From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: regression test for extended query protocol |
Date: | 2016-08-05 15:50:25 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZdr7K9CYXF+KhQktuOFGfD3_US-m41hL3TYE8FDme99w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I think it would be an interesting project for someone to try to
>> figure out how to make 'make check-extended-query-protocol' or similar
>> work.
>
> Seems like it would not be that hard to put some kind of option in psql
> to issue queries with PQexecParams not plain PQexec.
Yes, we did that.
> However, since
> that wouldn't exercise sending out-of-line parameters, it's not clear
> to me that it'd be a very interesting test.
Well, you exercise copyfuncs.c quite a bit more, if nothing else.
> I still suspect that doing this in core is mostly going to be duplicative
> effort, and we'd be better off making use of existing JDBC tests.
That's possible; I don't know much about the JDBC tests, so it's hard
for me to say how that would compare in terms of coverage to my
proposal. Perhaps both things are worth doing.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2016-08-05 15:58:07 | Re: Column COMMENTs in CREATE TABLE? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2016-08-05 15:45:16 | Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft |