Re: assessing parallel-safety

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: assessing parallel-safety
Date: 2015-03-20 15:02:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZdAX56ii_EWK6q7GBUNgpam0=RCaLaL70umARbycu92Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> 2015-03-20 14:19:31 GMT [4273]: [78-1] user=,db=,client= DEBUG:
> server process (PID 4285) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation
> fault

Any chance you can get us a stack backtrace of this crash?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2015-03-20 15:08:15 Re: assessing parallel-safety
Previous Message Vladimir Borodin 2015-03-20 15:00:16 Re: [pgadmin-support] Issue with a hanging apply process on the replica db after vacuum works on primary