Re: On partitioning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: On partitioning
Date: 2014-12-10 18:15:02
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZbTfDVTDzQHmjkWO9N5zVSqzUOOR4Ukkr=gJR0QUTfVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> Agreed, but it's possible to keep a block/CTID interface while doing
> something different on the disk.

Objection: hand-waving.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-12-10 18:21:39 Re: On partitioning
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-12-10 18:13:36 Re: On partitioning