Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Xi Wang <xi(dot)wang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] overflow checks optimized away
Date: 2013-09-09 16:21:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZbAeq1XkF_733ftFmY-VS5pikJ6FyKGefA6CrvnFDe6A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>> Should these patches be applied?
>
> I have a copy of the program and was going to take care of this.

When?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-09-09 16:37:25 Re: strange IS NULL behaviour
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-09-09 16:21:31 Re: dynamic shared memory