Re: "COPY foo FROM STDOUT" and ecpg

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "COPY foo FROM STDOUT" and ecpg
Date: 2013-02-26 17:21:53
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ_MzHF8+OPezfimqK86wGAs8WFh4CvnHJe02YyY5VWog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, I'd guess that it was an oversight. But it goes back all the way to
> Postgres95, so it's a bit too late to change that.

I don't see why. We've plugged holes like this before and will do so
again in the future, I'm sure.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2013-02-26 17:24:25 Re: pg_xlogdump
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-02-26 17:19:17 Re: auto_explain WAS: RFC: Timing Events