Re: shm_toc_lookup API

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: shm_toc_lookup API
Date: 2017-06-05 15:36:40
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZ_GAT21HLZsw=whXaj3uN_=bez420cRLP0149RPtvS_Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> shm_toc_lookup() returns NULL if it fails to find the desired key.
> Out of the 30 or so call sites, there is exactly one that has any
> use for that. Some of the rest have Asserts that they get back
> a non-null result, but the majority just blithely dereference the
> pointer. I do not find this cool at all; given that we're accessing
> a shared data structure, we should assign more than zero probability
> to the idea that we might not find what we expect to find when we
> expect to find it.
>
> I think that shm_toc_lookup() ought to be made to throw elog(ERROR) on an
> unexpected failure. To satisfy the one caller that doesn't want an error,
> we could either add a "bool noError" parameter to it, or split it into two
> functions shm_toc_lookup() and shm_toc_lookup_noerror(). The latter would
> require touching less code, but the former is probably more like what we'd
> have had if this were designed more carefully to begin with.

Either is OK with me.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-06-05 15:42:39 Re: make check false success
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-06-05 15:19:41 shm_toc_lookup API