Re: REVOKE [ADMIN OPTION FOR] ROLE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Egor Rogov <e(dot)rogov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: REVOKE [ADMIN OPTION FOR] ROLE
Date: 2015-07-24 17:20:40
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZY831pYUY3QZu6hFozs4nXGfP6a=1Ys+HbcLqFYBGkTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Egor Rogov <e(dot)rogov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> So, the question: is it a documentation bug (as it seems to me), code bug,
> or I missed something?

Your analysis looks right to me, but I don't know whether the code or
the documentation should be changed. This claim was added by Tom Lane
in 2005 in commit 58d214e51fe50b10b4439da6ec263d54c155afbf. It might
be worth checking whether the claim was true at that time and later
became false, or whether it was never true to begin with.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2015-07-24 17:21:55 Re: "make check" changes have caused buildfarm deterioration.
Previous Message Paul Ramsey 2015-07-24 17:19:53 Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support