Re: Fix comment in ATExecValidateConstraint

On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 4:18 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> The comment seems to have been copied from ATExecAddColumn, which says:
>
> /*
> * If we are told not to recurse, there had better not be any
> - * child tables; else the addition would put them out of step.
>
> For ATExecValidateConstraint, it should say something like:
>
> + * child tables; else validating the constraint would put them
> + * out of step.
>
> Attached patch fixes it.

I agree that the current comment is wrong, but what does "out of step"
actually mean here, anyway? I think this isn't very clear.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company