| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in parallel worker (ExecInitSubPlan) |
| Date: | 2016-06-09 16:44:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZX7MiiEKXFvtzS+h_JuE7bLJfJj3m2dfgHvND+YHpZgQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> No, I don't have a test case. I have tried a bit, but it seems even if
> there is a problem, one needs to spend quite some time to generate an exact
> test. I think the current patch fixes the reproducible problem [1], so lets
> go with it. We can look into Append case problem if some one has a
> reproducible case or if I could come up with one. In any case, I think it
> is a separate problem then what is reported in this thread.
OK, committed, then. I have an idea about what that other problem
might be that I'll investigate separately. For now, I'm marking this
open item as closed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-09 17:01:47 | Re: parallel workers and client encoding |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-06-09 16:43:49 | pgsql: Don't generate parallel paths for rels with parallel-restricted |