From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context |
Date: | 2015-04-23 13:47:13 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZX3QaxRtaMNd-DB=GTC_nn8oZDgeKkjcSQ4PhAuDQmAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I don't see a contradiction. There is clean agreement, so ERROR level should
> to show the context. NOTICE and WARNINGs doesn't need it - and there is a
> backward compatibility and usability reasons don't do it.
Whether notices and warnings need it is a matter of opinion. I don't
think your idea is bad, and it might be a good rule of thumb in many
cases, but I slightly prefer Marko's approach of adding a new option.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-04-23 13:50:24 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-23 13:45:38 | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |