Re: amcheck is using a wrong macro to check compressed-ness

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: amcheck is using a wrong macro to check compressed-ness
Date: 2022-06-22 17:14:57
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZX0c1Nuaz2Xdc5612LcA6RDswT7VAw3U+BZfwO2A7mNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 9:56 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 10:48:27AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Three weeks later, ping. Robert, could you look at this thread?
>
> And again. beta2 is planned to next week, and this is still an open
> item. I could look at that by myself, but I always tend to get easily
> confused with all the VARATT macros when it comes to compressed blobs,
> so it would take a bit of time.

Oops, I missed this thread. I think the patch is correct, so I have
committed it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-06-22 17:23:52 Re: Devel docs on website reloading
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2022-06-22 16:51:04 Re: SYSTEM_USER reserved word implementation