From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Observations in Parallel Append |
Date: | 2018-01-04 03:36:01 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZWzN6wUm0k-5+ros1RDJ+aV5qD8A+uyXH9GKNCwVpNkA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached, please find the patch which fixes this issue (Thanks to
> Dilip for helping me in identifying the above case and fix). I have
> also modified the comment atop function
> choose_next_subplan_for_worker() as discussed above. The change to
> remove unnecessary inclusion of spin.h is still in a separate patch as
> posted above.
Here's a combined patch with some cosmetic changes which I will commit
if it looks OK to you.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Code-review-for-Parallel-Append.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2018-01-04 03:54:41 | Re: Observations in Parallel Append |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-04 02:09:24 | Re: pgsql: Add parallel-aware hash joins. |