| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
| Date: | 2015-04-30 11:39:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZVB-2LnNymtWqdZeiwJBHxA5q7CRxoVku5cFgXSRDieA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached v10 patch is latest version patch.
> The syntax is,
> REINDEX { INDEX | ... } name [ WITH ] [ VERBOSE ]
>
> That is, WITH clause is optional.
I thought we agreed on moving this earlier in the command:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18569.1423159294@sss.pgh.pa.us
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sergey Grinko | 2015-04-30 11:44:53 | Loss of some parts of the function definition |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-30 11:37:07 | Re: [RFC] sepgsql: prohibit users to relabel objects |