Re: 9.5 release notes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.5 release notes
Date: 2015-08-06 17:48:26
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZUDjdswjM3Wqc_PTJedaoeM0hM4rtBXuGaqKDWXz0qeQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:05:54PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> On 11 June 2015 at 05:15, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view
>> > the output here:
>> >
>> > http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html
>> >
>>
>> I think it's worth mentioning
>> dcbf5948e12aa60b4d6ab65b6445897dfc971e01, probably under "General
>> Performance". It's an optimisation, and also a user-visible change to
>> the way LEAKPROOF works. Perhaps something like
>>
>> Allow pushdown of non-leakproof functions into security barrier views
>> if the function is not passed any arguments from the view.
>>
>> Previously only functions marked as LEAKPROOF could be pushed down
>> into security barrier views.
>
> Sorry, just looking at this now. Since RLS is new for 9.5, we wouldn't
> mention the RLS change in the release notes because is is part of the
> RLS new features, but we could mention the SB change --- the new text
> would be:
>
> Allow non-LEAKPROOF functions to be passed into security barrier views
> if the function does not reference any table columns (Dean Rasheed)
>
> However, this is usually a level of detail that I do not cover in the
> release notes, so I need someone else to tell me it should be added.

+1 for including it. That's a security-relevant backward incompatibility.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2015-08-06 17:51:22 Re: Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-08-06 17:29:20 Re: Thinko in processing of SHM message size info?