On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:28 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Well, we'd be getting rid of it because of a danger of data loss which we
> can't otherwise mitigate. Maybe it does need to be backpatched, even if we
> haven't had complaints.
What's wrong with the approach proposed in
http://postgr.es/m/55AFC302.1060805@iki.fi ?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company