From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2025-03-06 23:29:37 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZTa9LMqKmgzz3Erwh0VV6p6bWFdWLmKih72h8cBj0KNQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 3:50 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> That being said, I do think in-database parallelism would be useful in some
> cases. I frequently hear about problems with huge numbers of large objects
> on a cluster with one big database. But that's probably less likely than
> the many database case.
I could believe they're equally likely, or even that the
many-large-objects case is more likely. At any rate, they're both
things that can happen.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-06 23:32:06 | Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-03-06 23:25:29 | Re: what's going on with lapwing? |