| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shruthi Gowda <gowdashru(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade |
| Date: | 2022-07-18 20:28:35 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZT_5H44d_Bjz1cA7Na2sQe=nOHMh5CqDzcqHQfCNuB1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:06 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> How about adding a new binary_upgrade_* helper function for this purpose
> instead, instead of tying it into truncate?
I considered that briefly, but it would need to do a lot of things
that TRUNCATE already knows how to do, so it does not seem like a good
idea.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-07-18 20:34:50 | Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample() |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-07-18 20:27:30 | Re: [PATCH] Introduce array_shuffle() and array_sample() |