From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: heap_freeze_tuple locking requirements |
Date: | 2012-03-26 15:06:18 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZT1WEjt9Sn=DrmpKRT2L2A1CocwoJvdoWwsqoaoMe9+w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié mar 21 21:50:24 -0300 2012:
>> heap_freeze_tuple() was apparently designed at one point to cope with
>> being called with either a shared or exclusive buffer lock. But none
>> of the current callers call it with a shared lock; they all call it
>> with an exclusive lock, except for the heap-rewrite code which doesn't
>> take (or need) a lock at all.
>
>> Since this is just dead code removal, I propose to apply this to 9.2.
>
> +1
Thanks, done.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2012-03-26 15:16:42 | Re: Odd out of memory problem. |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-03-26 15:03:45 | Odd out of memory problem. |