Re: multi-column range partition constraint

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Olaf Gawenda <olaf(dot)gw(at)googlemail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: multi-column range partition constraint
Date: 2017-05-12 16:46:04
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZR1wH8akeBi71x=GWvU-zWVGmhmSSQDSu3Cz34tp2b2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Fixed.

This seems to be the same patch version as last time, so none of the
things you mention as fixed are, in fact, fixed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-05-12 16:51:51 Re: eval_const_expresisions and ScalarArrayOpExpr
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2017-05-12 16:40:33 Re: snapbuild woes