From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |
Date: | 2015-03-09 16:29:58 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZPNJmP7u_ZB3y33nDqgJrekTfVG6CdtnGvSmfoxHZc-g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> From the reading the original post it seems like the patch was developed on
> Sales Force's time, not TGLs. I do not think we get to have an opinion on
> that.
Salesforce gets to develop their patches whenever they want, but they
don't get to control the community process for getting those patches
committed to PostgreSQL.
> Thank you Tom for the efforts you made here, making the largest used PL
> better, faster, stronger is exactly the type of micro-changes we need to be
> looking at for further polish within the database.
So, just to be clear, are you proposing that everybody is exempted
from the CommitFest deadlines, or just Tom?
Thanks,
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-03-09 16:31:25 | Re: Bootstrap DATA is a pita |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-03-09 16:26:04 | Re: Rethinking the parameter access hooks for plpgsql's benefit |