| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Ibrar Ahmed <ibrar(dot)ahmad(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f |
| Date: | 2025-02-12 18:11:07 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZP-J+GGV-Cqibk+A04FGa9VJp_M2u4+H1oCJMwo=Kx-g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:18 PM Ilia Evdokimov
<ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com> wrote:
> With such example, it's hard to disagree with it. This would really add
> valuable information. Taking all opinions into account, I have updated
> the patch v8. I have also included a check for the case where there are
> only zeros after the decimal point. We do not want to clutter the rows
> with unnecessary zeros.
I disagree. We don't do this for any other fractional value we print
in any other part of the system, and I do not think this case should
be some kind of weird exception.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2025-02-12 18:14:52 | Re: pg_stat_statements and "IN" conditions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-02-12 18:00:22 | Re: AIO v2.3 |