From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Krzysztof Kaczkowski <grafvader(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cluster on NAS and data center. |
Date: | 2016-07-07 15:30:54 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZOZROL-ah7s1GmUYFZErkQZtOoLDxj0-xezkxJsE6kVQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Krzysztof Kaczkowski
<grafvader(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks to emails, we have achieved what we wanted. This is what we’ve done:
>
> Compilation (for 32 bit version, initdb with locale=C):
>
> CFLAGS="-mx32 -fexcess-precision=standard -O2"
> CXXFLAGS="-mx32"
>
> configure --without-zlib --disable-float8-byval --without-readline
> --host=x86_64-linux-gnux32
>
> We also have installed libx32.
>
> Right now we received cluster that is fully manageable from both systems.
> Anyone see something dangerous with this compilation?
That seems to cover a fair amount of territory, but it might be unwise
to assume that there are no other issues.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-07 15:35:22 | Re: Parallel query and temp_file_limit |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-07 15:10:12 | Re: Reviewing freeze map code |