Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Date: 2017-11-14 18:12:07
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZOZEB8-gWJPsA_MyJu-AT_vqojwYbLdeW+5J7S+V26dg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> Here's the remaining bits, rebased.

It's true that Tom and I reviewed patch 0001, as your proposed commit
message states. But it's also true that we both said that it probably
wasn't a good idea.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-11-14 18:42:27 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-14 18:09:26 Re: [HACKERS] Transaction control in procedures