From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]" <KBaker9(at)its(dot)jnj(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal to add a QNX 6.5 port to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2014-08-20 16:25:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZOY=ksovamsPyBHUt76gbDH_19XZzf_Lkcw2Am9izBOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Baker, Keith [OCDUS Non-J&J]
<KBaker9(at)its(dot)jnj(dot)com> wrote:
> My proof of concept code (steps a though e below) avoided any reading or writing to the pipe (and associated handling of SIGPIPE), it just relied on postmaster open of PIPE with ENXIO to indicate all is clear.
I'm not following.
> Robert, Assuming an algorithm choice is agreed upon in the near future, would you be the logical choice to implement the change?
> I am happy to help, especially with any QNX-specific aspects, but don't want to step on anyone's toes.
I'm unlikely to have time to work on this in the immediate future, but
I may be able to help review.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mayeul Kauffmann | 2014-08-20 16:56:06 | Re: Patching for increasing the number of columns |
Previous Message | Fabrízio de Royes Mello | 2014-08-20 16:02:03 | Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED |