Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: 2016-12-08 18:04:31
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZNpXHBp8yADNS7HST9OJAx4_MoZ5ckbxoFhSYo84nY2w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I have a DML statement which triggers the error:
>> ERROR: XX000: outer pathkeys do not match mergeclauses
>> LOCATION: create_mergejoin_plan, createplan.c:3722
>
> Hmm.
>
>> Any tips on investigating this further in situ? Or is the best option just
>> to work harder on a minimal and disclosable test case?
>
> I think we need a test case --- not minimal necessarily, but something
> other people can reproduce. You might find that setting enable_hashjoin
> and/or enable_nestloop to false makes it easier to provoke the error,
> since evidently this requires that we (a) generate a faulty mergejoin Path
> and then (b) choose it as the cheapest one, since the error occurs while
> converting it to a Plan.

Maybe it would help for Jeff to use elog_node_display() to the nodes
that are causing the problem - e.g. outerpathkeys and innerpathkeys
and best_path->path_mergeclauses, or just best_path - at the point
where the error is thrown. That might give us enough information to
see what's broken.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aleksander Alekseev 2016-12-08 18:23:49 Re: [PATCH] Refactor "if(strspn(str, ...) == strlen(str)" code
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-08 17:52:26 Re: Back-patch use of unnamed POSIX semaphores for Linux?