| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq |
| Date: | 2011-12-09 15:56:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZMNseOkcCqsBMLWRoSNP-r+URMqQ0JQO2HQhBsRq9WLw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Alexander Shulgin <ash(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> See above. The hope is that URIs will be compatible sans the driver-specific extra query parameters which might be not recognized by either party.
Yeah. I am not that concerned with being stupidity-compatible with
anyone else ... but neither am I inclined to go out of our way to be
incompatible. It seems like the design on the table might allow us to
get the best of both worlds.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2011-12-09 16:02:19 | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-12-09 15:16:26 | Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem |