Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release
Date: 2015-05-31 11:24:38
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZKuepDqKG1NuRd5tbUJgMhKwoedHAGxvw+C6EgDmxVQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
>> What, in this release, could break things badly? RLS? Grouping sets?
>> Heikki's WAL format changes? That last one sounds really scary to me;
>> it's painful if not impossible to fix the WAL format in a minor
>> release.
>
> I think we actually have learned some lessons here. MultiXacts were a
> somewhat unusual case for a couple of reasons that I need not rehash.
>
> In contrast, Heikki's WAL format changes (just for example) are
> fundamentally just a restructuring to the existing format. Sure, there
> could be bugs, but I think that it's fundamentally different to the
> 9.3 MultiXact stuff, in that the MultiXact stuff appears to be
> stubbornly difficult to stabilize over months and years. That feels
> like something that is unlikely to be true for anything that made it
> into 9.5.

I hope you're right. But I don't think any of us foresaw just how bad
the MultiXact thing was likely to be either.

In fact, I think to some extent we may STILL be in denial about how bad it is.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-05-31 11:51:59 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2015-05-31 11:15:38 Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release