Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:59 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 9:25 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > On 6/16/21 03:52, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:01 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> > >> Rather than use size, I'd be inclined to say use this if the source
> > >> database is marked as a template, and use the copydir approach for
> > >> anything that isn't.
> > > Yeah, that is possible, on the other thought wouldn't it be good to
> > > provide control to the user by providing two different commands, e.g.
> > > COPY DATABASE for the existing method (copydir) and CREATE DATABASE
> > > for the new method (fully wal logged)?
> >
> > This proposal seems to have gotten lost.
>
> Yeah, I am planning to work on this part so that we can support both methods.

But can we pick a different syntax? In my view this should be an
option to CREATE DATABASE rather than a whole new command.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com