| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu> |
| Subject: | Re: Timeout parameters |
| Date: | 2019-03-12 17:05:20 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZKcDsLpMC+22oJGiGEzYhpKGGoxVHrShH=4GQsC1ayYw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:25 PM Nagaura, Ryohei
<nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> The main purpose of this parameter is to avoid client's waiting for DB server infinitely, not reducing the server's burden.
> This results in not waiting end-user, which is most important.
+1. If the server fails to detect that the client has gone away,
that's the server's problem. The client is entirely entitled to be
selfish if it so wishes.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-03-12 17:13:42 | Re: Use nanosleep(2) in pg_usleep, if available? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-12 16:59:44 | Re: Use nanosleep(2) in pg_usleep, if available? |