From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql describe.c cleanup |
Date: | 2011-07-06 14:14:04 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZGVC_nFBTytHaYV=iyUga+6Ln-4LqztU1WdysnTYjvXQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> What I do wonder though is if the ; appending should really be
>>>> happening in printQuery() instead of in each query -- the idea being
>>>> that formatting for external consumption should be happening in one
>>>> place. Maybe that's over-thinking it though.
>>>
>>> That's a fair point, and hacking up printQuery() would indeed solve my
>>> original gripe about copy-pasting queries out of psql -E. But more
>>> generally, I think that standardizing the style of the code is a Good
>>> Thing, particularly where style issues impact usability (like here).
>>
>> sure -- if anyone would like to comment on this one way or the other
>> feel free -- otherwise I'll pass the patch up the chain as-is...it's
>> not exactly the 'debate of the century' :-).
>
> done. marked ready for committer.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2011-07-06 14:24:52 | Re: storing TZ along timestamps |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-06 13:55:01 | Re: Avoid index rebuilds for no-rewrite ALTER TABLE ALTER TYPE |