| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Assertion failure with summarize_wal enabled during pg_createsubscriber |
| Date: | 2024-07-22 15:02:51 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZGEsZodXC4f=XZNkAeyuDmWTSkpkjCEOcF19Am0mt_OA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I went ahead and committed 0001, which is pretty trivial. Hopefully,
at least, it's trivial enough that I didn't mess it up.
Here's a rebase of 0002 and 0003, now 0001 and 0002, with one minor
fix to hopefully avoid annoying CI.
I'm still hoping for some review/feedback/testing of these before I
commit them, but I also don't want to wait too long.
Thanks,
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0002-Wait-for-WAL-summarization-to-catch-up-before-cre.patch | application/octet-stream | 19.8 KB |
| v3-0001-Allow-WAL-summarization-to-back-up-when-timeline-.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2024-07-22 15:10:39 | Re: Custom explain options |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-07-22 14:46:29 | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |