Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Arthur Zakirov <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alex Ignatov <a(dot)ignatov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, amul sul <sul_amul(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)in>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in to_timestamp().
Date: 2017-11-30 15:39:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZF2BvVJV8EC5XiAv_Jd8Pspn+2YnrWtGDVvLZ=wQykTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 12:23 AM, Arthur Zakirov
> <a(dot)zakirov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
>> Messages have the following format now:
>>
>> SELECT to_timestamp('97/Feb/16', 'FXYY:Mon:DD');
>> ERROR: unexpected character "/", expected ":"
>> HINT: In FX mode, punctuation in the input string must exactly match the format string.
>
> Moved to next CF as this is fresh and got no reviews.

So is it now the case that all of the regression test cases in this
patch produce the same results as they would on Oracle?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2017-11-30 15:44:18 Re: Commit fest 2017-11
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-11-30 15:32:31 Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Call RelationDropStorage() for broader range of object drops.