Re: logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION, query cancellations and slot handling)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: logical replication syntax (was DROP SUBSCRIPTION, query cancellations and slot handling)
Date: 2017-05-02 21:24:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZDyS_rfgcJC572djeaevAAdfy92EjM9k8SWGcn7DvzVQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 5:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> > 2) don't drop because we know it won't work. I see two options:
>> > c) ignore a drop slot failure, i.e. don't cause a transaction abort.
>> > An easy way to implement this is just add a PG_TRY block, but we
>> > dislike adding those and not re-throwing the error.
>>
>> Dislike doesn't seem like the right word. Unless you rollback a
>> (sub)transaction, none of the cleanup that would normally do is done,
>
> True. So one possible implementation is that we open a subtransaction
> before dropping the slot, and we abort it if things go south. This is a
> bit slower, but not critically so.

I think that could work. Subtransaction abort isn't as fast as I
would sometimes like, but for a DDL command the overhead is pretty
insignificant.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2017-05-02 21:26:16 Re: pg_dump emits ALTER TABLE ONLY partitioned_table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-02 21:23:17 Re: [GENERAL] Column rename in an extension update script