| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Date: | 2011-12-18 00:06:02 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZCyxjhTwt+mDuJFf8hKdg6O4Um=5zpANRVe1i6=TPk6A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
> I'd like to add some confusion on the implementation choice, because it
> looks damn too easy now… Guile 2.0 offers an implementation of the
> ECMAscript language and plscheme already exists as a PostgreSQL PL
> extension for integrating with Guile.
It seems like the licensing there could potentially be problematic.
It's GPL with a linking exception. Not sure we want to go there.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2011-12-18 00:50:11 | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-12-17 22:26:56 | Re: WIP: SP-GiST, Space-Partitioned GiST |