From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl always uses the same event source |
Date: | 2014-01-22 13:24:21 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZCiZMNbFjuNNQER9zYmXXf11scBekVxkiuN0-nFU_cow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:20 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:57 PM, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> To follow this, we have the line as:
>>>>
>>>> #event_source = 'PostgreSQL 9.4'
>>>>
>>>> But this requires us to change this line for each major release. That's a
>>>> maintenance headache.
>>
>>> What I had in mind was to change it during initdb, we are already doing it
>>> for some other parameter (unix_socket_directories),
>>
>> What happens when somebody copies their postgresql.conf from an older
>> version? That's hardly uncommon, even though it might be considered bad
>> practice. I don't think it's a good idea to try to insert a version
>> identifier this way.
>>
>> But ... what's the point of including the PG version in this string
>> anyhow? If you're trying to make the string unique across different
>> installations on the same machine, it's surely insufficient, and if
>> that's not the point then what is?
>
> Well, certainly it cannot handle all different scenario's (particularly
> same version installations), but the original report for this case was
> for different versions of server. I think chances of having different
> versions of server are much more, which will be handled by this
> case.
I wonder if the port number wouldn't be a better choice. And that
could even be done without adding a parameter.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-01-22 13:25:28 | Re: Hard limit on WAL space used (because PANIC sucks) |
Previous Message | Jov | 2014-01-22 13:06:32 | Re: improve the help message about psql -F |